A reliable decision order
- Use the form the person gives you. An introduction, email signature, name badge, or explicit preference is direct evidence.
- Check for an established role title. Teacher, professor, team leader, manager, and other recognized roles may be the normal address form.
- Observe the local convention. Some teams use role + 님, some use given name + 님, some use English names, and some deliberately avoid ranks.
- Compare your relationship. The way peers address one another may not transfer upward to a manager or outward to a client.
- When evidence is missing, do not invent rank. Use a polite greeting, the introduced name, or ask.
This order explains why K-MANNER separates two tools. The -ssi / -nim Finder asks whether a name suffix, title, or neutral alternative fits. The Title Finder starts with a known school or workplace role and helps identify the organizational form.
-ssi is polite, but it is not a universal Mr. or Ms.
씨 (-ssi) commonly follows a given name or full name in polite interaction. It can fit peers, acquaintances, or coworkers depending on the organization. Its nuance changes with who uses it, which portion of the name it follows, and the power relationship.
“Minji, did you receive the meeting materials?” A possible peer-level use where the team addresses people this way.
A family name + 씨 can sound downward, brusque, or otherwise marked in some relationships. It should not be applied mechanically from an English surname pattern. Upward address to a manager, teacher, or client often calls for the person’s recognized title or the convention that person has introduced.
-nim marks respect, but attachment matters
님 (-nim) is an honorific element found with roles and titles, as in 선생님 and 팀장님. It can also appear with names, account names, or service labels in conventions that support that use. This does not make name + 님 a universally superior replacement for -씨.
Think of -님 as part of a construction rather than a detachable “more polite” button. A company that has standardized name + 님 is giving you strong local evidence. In a company that consistently uses role + 님, replacing the role with a name may erase useful status information or sound outside the group norm.
“Customer, I will check your order.” Here 고객님 is a service-role address, not the customer’s personal name.
Job titles can be address terms
Korean workplaces often use a role or rank directly in address, commonly with 님. Examples include 팀장님 (team leader + nim), 부장님 (department manager/director + nim), and 대표님 (representative/CEO + nim). Exact English equivalents vary by organization, so the internal role is more important than a one-to-one translation.
Titles also change. A person’s official HR rank, project role, outward-facing English title, and preferred address may not match. Use the title relevant to the current group and task rather than assuming that one label follows the person everywhere.
| Evidence | What it supports | What it does not prove |
|---|---|---|
| Everyone says 팀장님 | Role + 님 is established in that team. | That every Korean company uses the same form. |
| Email signature says “Jiyoon Kim, Mina” | The person may use an English/preferred name professionally. | That suffixes can be added without checking convention. |
| A colleague is older | Age may affect general interaction. | Their job rank or correct organizational title. |
| Policy says all staff use name + 님 | A deliberate local convention. | That role titles are wrong outside this organization. |
When you do not know the title, leave room to learn it
Guessing a high-sounding title can be inaccurate, and guessing a low one can be awkward. Korean allows polite interaction without repeatedly naming the addressee. A greeting, 실례합니다 (“Excuse me”), or a politely phrased question can open the exchange while you learn the person’s form.
“Excuse me. What should I call you?” Useful when an ongoing relationship makes the answer worth asking.
In email, the person’s signature, prior thread, company directory, or the form used by a trusted colleague may supply the answer. Do not infer a title solely from an email address or photograph.
Workplace dialogues
“Team lead, do you have a moment?” The role title and polite, honorific predicate work together.
“Minji, shall we check this part together?” Possible between peers where -씨 is the established form.
“On our team, we add nim after names.” The sentence states a local convention; follow it within that team.
“Please use my job title in meetings.” A setting-specific preference can coexist with a different private or team norm.
Common mistakes
- Ranking -씨 below -님 in every case. They have different distributions; context and construction matter.
- Using only age to choose a workplace title. Age does not reveal role, rank, or team policy.
- Copying a peer’s form upward. The same speaker may use different forms with a peer, manager, client, and professor.
- Adding 님 twice. Some titles already conventionally contain the element; reproduce the established form rather than assembling honorific pieces blindly.
- Assuming one company represents Korea. Organizational reforms, industry, size, generation, and team culture produce real variation.
- Ignoring the rest of the sentence. A respectful title does not repair an inappropriately casual command, tone, or speech level.
Editorial sources and review limits
- National Institute of Korean Language — 우리, 뭐라고 부를까요? — see the workplace relationship section (printed pages 42–46) for titles, name + 씨/님, and variation among organizations
These sources support the terminology and established patterns identified above; they do not make every relationship or workplace identical. K-MANNER therefore treats a person's stated preference and a group's documented convention as stronger evidence for a specific situation.
Apply the guide to a real situation
The guide explains the variables. The finder turns those variables into a cautious starting point and shows why it fits.
Use the School & Workplace Title Finder →Editorial review: October 29, 2026. K-MANNER describes common patterns, not a rule that overrides an individual or group’s stated preference.